(TABLE FORMAT WITH RATIONALE FOR CHANGES)

 

(Suggested changes by consensus have been italicized and underlined for easy identification. This consensus emerged during the meetings on 10th March and 21st April 02, in Mumbai amongst representatives of CEHAT, Association of Medical Consultants, Mumbai, Forum for Medical Ethics, ACASH, WACHA, Women's Centre, Health Committee Lokvidnyan Saanghatana Pune.)


AMENDMENTS
TO
The
Bombay Nursing Home Registration Act (1949)

 






Existing Provision & Proposed Changes

 

Incorporating the Proposed Changes / Incorporations from the
Stakeholders Workshop (
1st July, 2001)



Submitted

by

Sunil Nandraj

July, 2001


MAHARASHTRA HEALTH SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
GOVERNMENT OF
MAHARASHTRA
MUMBAI

CONTENTS


1) Short title, extent and commencement
2) Definitions
3) Prohibition to carry on nursing home without registration
4) Application for registration
5) Registration
6) Penalty for non-registration
7) Cancellation of registration
8) Notice of refusal or of cancellation of registration
9) Inspection of nursing homes
10) Income of local supervising authority
11) Expenses of local supervising authority
12) Penalty for offences under Act
13) Offences by corporations
14) Court competent to try offences under Act
15) Indemnity to persons acting under this Act
16) Rules
17) By-law
18) Saving

New sections to be incorporated in the Act / Rules
Furnishing of information
Constitution of the competent authority and advisory committees
Minimum requirements of clinical establishment
Obligations of clinical establishment
Engaging government servant
Display of fees, costs and rates for various services
Power to remove difficulties
Miscellaneous

ANNEXURE I
ANNEXURE II

Short title, extent and commencement
Section 1

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

1

Bombay Nursing Homes Registration Act”, 1949

The Maharashtra Clinical Establishments Act, 2001

Comprehensive act would cover all private and government (Central, State, Municipal, Zilla Parishad, autonomous) clinical establishments.

2

Presently applicable to the cities of Mumbai, Pune, Sholapur & Nagpur

Whole state of Maharashtra

Should cover both rural and urban areas of the state

3

The act shall come into on such date as may be specified in the notification

They shall come into force on the date of the notification in the Maharastra Government Gazette

 

 

Definitions
Section 2

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

Nursing Homes "any premises used or intended to be used, for the reception of persons suffering from any sickness, injury or infirmity and the providing of treatment and nursing for them, and includes a maternity home; and the expression 'to carry on nursing home' means to receive persons in a nursing home for any of the aforesaid purposes and to provide treatment or nursing for them".

Nursing Homes "any premises used or intended to be used, for the reception of persons suffering from any sickness, injury or infirmity and the providing of treatment and nursing for them, and includes a maternity home; and the expression 'to carry on nursing home' means to receive persons in a nursing home for any of the aforesaid purposes and to provide treatment or nursing for them".

No Changes

 

Maternity Homes "any premise used or intended to be used for the reception of pregnant women or of women in or immediately after child birth".

Maternity Homes "any premise used or intended to be used for the reception of pregnant women for normal delivery, this would exclude those not having OT.

Need to differentiate between those providing surgical and those not providing surgical Though it is desirable that a maternity home should have a surgical facilities for caesarean section, this is not possible in many villages, small towns. Instead of closing such facilities, they can continue to play a role in rural area.

 

Qualified medical practitioner “a medical practitioner registered under the relevant Medical Act in force”

Qualified medical practitioner “a medical practitioner registered under the relevant Medical Act in force” It would mean “a person who possesses any of the recognized medical qualifications and who has been enrolled in the register of the respective Medical Council. Viz., Allopathy, Dental, Homeopathic and Board of Indian Medicine or any such council, Board or any other statutory body recognized by the government”.

Need to be more specific and mention various systems of medicine, dentists and make it more specific to only include those recognized by the various medical councils

 

Qualified midwife means “a midwife registered or deemed to be registered under the Bombay Nurses, Midwives and Health Visitors Act, 1954 or any other corresponding law for the time being in force”

Qualified midwife means “a midwife registered or deemed to be registered under the Bombay Nurses, Midwives and Health Visitors Act, 1954 or any other corresponding law for the time being in force”

No Changes

 

Local Supervisory Authority “In case of 'district' local board' means any area other than a municipal area, means a district local board, district board, district panchayat or Janapada Sabha or similar local authority established under any law for the time being in force relating to the constitution of such authorities and having jurisdiction over such area;” 'municipality' means a municipal corporation, municipality, municipal committee, town committee or similar local authority established under any law for the time, being in force relating to the constitution of such authorities and 'municipal area' means the local area within the jurisdiction of a municipality;”

Local Supervisory Authority “In case of 'district' local board' means any area other than a municipal area, means a district local board, district board, district panchayat or Janapada Sabha or similar local authority established under any law for the time being in force relating to the constitution of such authorities and having jurisdiction over such area;” 'municipality' means a municipal corporation, municipality, municipal committee, town committee or similar local authority established under any law for the time, being in force relating to the constitution of such authorities and 'municipal area' means the local area within the jurisdiction of a municipality;”

No Changes

 

Prescribed: means prescribed by rules made under this Act

Prescribed: means prescribed by rules made under this Act

No Changes

 

Register: means to register under section 5 of this Act and the expressions' "registered" and registration shall be construed accordingly.

Register: means to register under section 5 of this Act and the expressions' "registered" and registration shall be construed accordingly.

No Changes

 

By-law means “By-law's made by the local supervising authority”;

By-law means “By-law's made by the local supervising authority”;

No Changes

 

Rules means “rules made under this Act”.

Rules means “rules made under this Act”.

No Changes

 

 

Clinical establishment means “any medical clinic (inpatient and or out patient), nursing home, maternity home, hospital, old age homes, day care centers, physical therapy establishment, in-vitro fertility clinics, medical laboratory / diagnostic Center, Radiological Centers / Panning Center, Physiotherapy Center, dispensary (with bed), medical institution / center of analogous establishment, by whatever name called: where investigation, diagnosis invasive procedure / curative medical treatment facilities are provided to the public”.

Need to include all those providing health care both inpatient and out patient and from various systems of medicine. The definition of clinical establishment should only include Treatment centres managed by qualified medical persons who are registered under relevant laws and respective council,labarotories scanning centres, physiotherapy centres(to be differentiated from physical therapy centres) The other sectors should be brought under regulation of a separate Council for Alternative therapy.

 

 

Hospital means “a place where patients are treated as inpatients with facilities for admission as inpatients for treatment of illness without or with surgery or conduct of delivery and also includes other gynecological operations where women are received or accommodated for the purpose of sterlisation, hysterectomy, or medical termination of pregnancy. etc. with or without inpatient facilities”.

Need to include and make it more comprehensive, for more specify

 

 

Medical Laboratory means “an establishment where bio-Medical, biological, clinical pathological, biopsy, bacteriological, radiological, microscopic, chemical, genetic investigations or any other diagnostic tests, examinations or analysis or the preparation of cultures, vaccines, serums or other biological or bacteriological products, in connection with the diagnosis or treatment of diseases, are or is usual carried on”.

Need to include them since they do not come under any act and are major providers of health care. Laboratory should only include the centres where chemical,biochemical,bacteriological,radiological,pathological tests are done for diagnosis and treatment.This should not include places where vaccines/sera are prepared.

 

 

Physical Therapy Establishment means “an establishment where massaging, electrotherapy, hydrotherapy or similar work is usually carried on, for the purpose of treatment of diseases or of infirmity or for any other purpose whatsoever, whether or not analogous to the purposes herein before mentioned in this clause”.

As this is another important aspect of medicine, it is necessary to include them. Since these disciplines themselves do not have any legal sanction as a profession, they can not be included in this act.

 

 

Scan Centre means “a place where Ultra Sound Sonogram, CT scan or MRI Scan tests are done including contrast studies and/or diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures are carried out” and would also include any other advanced method of scanning. X-Ray centre means “a place where X-rays are taken or contrast studies are done” (excludes scanning mentioned above).

As this is another important aspect of medicine, it is necessary to include them. MRI, CAT-scan centres need to be included in this act. However,The Medical Establishment should not be subjected to different registration procedures for different facilities it provides to the patients. Thus separate registration process to register as MTP centre, as sonology centre, as hospital etc. should be avoided. There should be a single form, with different annexures, to be submitted to a single authority. At least, there should be a single window system for registration under different acts.

 

 

Council means a council or any such body recognized by the government for the registration of the various practitioners.

Needed to be more specific.

 

 

Disease means “a notifiable disease which a Registered Medical Practitioner is required to notify to the Medical and Health Officer of his area under the law for the time being in force”;

Needed to be more specific

 

 

Medical Treatment means “systematic diagnosis and treatment for prevention or cure of any disease, or to improve the condition of health of any person through allopathic or any other recognized systems of medicine such as Ayurveda, Unani, Homeopathy, Yoga, Naturopathy and Siddha; and includes Acupuncture and Acupressure treatments”.

Needed to be more specific Since there is no statutory council for acupressure, acupuncture, naturopathy, yoga-therapy, none of them can as of today be included in the BNHRA.

 

 

Competent Authority means “the committee constituted under this act to assist the local supervisory authority in discharging the functions under this act.

To provide for a more participatory system of implementation.

 

 

Clinical Establishment Registration Board: means a board set up under the act to be an apex body for the implementation of the act, lay down minimum requirements (standards) or upgrade existing requirements periodically for different types of clinical establishments, appropriate number of types of clinical establishments in a geographical area and suggest revision of fees charged periodically.

A body to provide for a platform, act as a catalyst and be a conduit for developing standards, upgrading them, act as an arbiter and examine the issue of health care establishments. Overall for the implementation of the act and to provide for a leadership in better health care delivery system for the state. The provision to control the number of types of clinical establishments in a geographical area, though desirable, would be challenged in the court ( freedom to do business anywhere in India) and this may delay the implementation of this act.

 

Prohibitions to carry on nursing home without registration
Section 3

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

No person shall carry on a nursing home unless he has been duly registered in respect of such nursing home and the registration in respect thereof has not been cancelled under section 7. Provided that nothing n this section shall apply in the case of a nursing home which is in existence at the date of the commencement of this Act, for a period of three months from such date or if an application for registration is made within that period in accordance with the provisions of section 4 until such application is finally disposed of.

No person shall carry on a clinical establishment unless it has been duly registered in respect of such clinical establishment and the registration in respect thereof has not been cancelled under section 7. Provided that nothing in this section shall apply in the case of a clinical establishment which is in existence at the date of the commencement of this Act,for a period of three months from such date or if an application for registration is made within that period in accordance with the provisions of section 4 until such application is finally disposed of.

Only changes in the term nursing homes to clinical establishment . The period for initiation of enforcement of this act should be 6 months in new areas.

 



Application for Registration
Section 4

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

1

Every person intending to carry on a nursing home shall make every year an application for registration or the renewal of registration to the local supervising authority. Provided that in the case of nursing home which is in existence at the date of the commencement of this Act an application for registration shall be made within three months from such date.

Every person /body intending to carry on a clinical establishment shall make every three years an application for renewal of registration to the local supervising authority.

The registration would be valid for 3 years with a mandatory inspection An application for the registration / renewal of registration shall be made in advance in the prescribed form at least three months before the date on which the registration and the license are to expire and shall be accompanied by the fee prescribed. The local supervisory authority or any person authorized on its behalf and shall assign an acknowledgement number immediately if delivered at office or the local supervisory authority or within 15 days if received by post. The local supervisory authority on receiving the application form and various forms and details provided conduct physical checks of the premises and inspect the adherence to standards prescribed from time to time by the clinical establishment registration board or the rules framed under the act. After satisfying itself that the applicant has compiled with all the requirements and has the capacity to provide the services in an requisite manner place the application along with the required forms and recommendation before the competent authority for its advice. The competent authority shall advise the local supervisory authority as to whether the applicant be issued registration certificate. The competent authority may if necessary inspect the premises of the applicant before giving its advice. The local supervisory and competent authority shall dispose of every application received within three months from the date of receipt of application. The establishment would be deemed to have been registered in case there is no response from the local supervisory authority in four months from the date of application.

The implementation would be proper if the registration is for 3 years. Inspection would ensure adherence to maintenance of standards. It would give sufficient time for the paper to be processed and make the necessary inspection Renewal reminder notice – A renewal reminder notice be sent by registered post by the LSA. 4 months in advance of the date of renewal. The charges for the same be included in the triannual service-fee to be charged to all the medical establishments, registered under this act. To make the implementing authorities more accountable. The clause about physical examination should be more specific and structured. The The person authorised to inspect and physically examine the place should have technical/medical expertise of the same specialty to which the the concerned clinical establishment belongs. Above mentioned qualification should also be made mandatory for Inspection by competent authority. It may be noted that the inspecting person need not be a doctor. Many of the minimum standards relate to infrastrutural facilities like space, water supply, etc and availability of trained human power and certain equipment. For inspection of up to secondary level health-care facilities, this can be done by a specially trained paramedic, and this would reduce the cost of regulatory/ monitoring mechanism. Specially trained doctors would be required only for tertiary level facilities, to check special equipments. The competent authority is not just a rubber stamp but is also provided powers. They have the final authority. This would ensure the participation of the various stakeholders in the implementation process To make the implementing authorities more accountable and ensure efficiency and make the implementing agency be pro active

2

Every application for registration or the renewal of registration shall be made on such date and in such form and shall be accompanied by such fee, as may be prescribed.

Every application for registration or the renewal of registration shall be made on such date and in such form with information at least three months before the date on which he intends to start or carry on such clinical establishment and shall be accompanied by such fee, as may be prescribed

It gives sufficient time for the local supervisory authority to inspect and give a proper well informed registration to the clinical establishment.

 

Rule (Section 4), 1973

Application for registration – Any person intending to carry on a nursing home shall make an application to the local supervising authority in Form 'B' at least one month before the date on which he intends to carry on such a nursing home. Such application shall be accompanied by a fee prescribed in sub-rule (1) of rule 7.

Application for registration – Any person /body intending to carry on a clinical establishment shall make an application to the local supervising authority in Form 'B' at least three months before the date on which he/she intends to carry on such a nursing home. Such application shall be accompanied by a fee prescribed in sub-rule (1) of rule 7. .

It gives sufficient time for the local supervisory authority to inspect and give a proper well informed registration to the clinical establishment.

 

 




Registration
Section 5

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

1

Subject to the provisions of this act and the rules, the local supervising authority shall, on the receipt of an application for registration, register the applicant in respect of the nursing home named in the application and issue to him a certificate of registration in the prescribed form. Provided that the local supervising authority may refuse to register the applicant if it is satisfied: a) that he, or any person employed by him/her at the nursing home, is not a fit person, whether by reason of age or otherwise to carry on or to be employed at a nursing home of such a description as the nursing home named in the application; or b) that the nursing home is not under the management of a person who is either a qualified medical practitioner or a qualified nurse among the persons having the superintendence of or employed in the nursing of the patients in the home, or c) that in the case of a maternity home it has not got on its staff a qualified mid-wife; or d) that for reasons connected with the situation, construction, accommodation, staffing or equipment, the nursing home of such a description as nursing home mentioned in the application or that the nursing home or premises are used or are to be used for purposes which are in any way improper or undesirable in the case of such nursing home.

1) Subject to the provisions of this act and the rules, the local supervising authority shall, on the receipt of an application for registration, register the applicant in respect of the clinical establishment named in the application and issue to him/her a certificate of registration in the prescribed form. Provided that the local supervising authority may refuse to register the applicant if it is satisfied: a) the clinical establishment is not under the supervisory management of a person who is qualified and registered in the council recognized by the government b) the rules and By-laws under the act are not followed c) recommendation and advice of the competent authority d) does not meet the minimum requirements laid down. e) used for purposes which are in any way improper or undesirable and not for those purposes registered.

Only changes in the term nursing homes to clinical establishment The owner of the clinical establishment could be a non medical person but it should be under the supervisory management of a person who is qualified and recognized.

2

A certificate of registration issued under this section shall, subject to the provisions of section 7, be in force and shall be valid until the 31st day of March next following the date on which such certificate was issued.

A certificate of registration issued under this section shall, subject to the provisions of this act, be in force and shall be valid for a period of three years from the date of such certificate issued.

 

3

The certificate of registration issued in respect of a nursing home shall be kept affixed in a conspicuous place in the nursing home.

The certificate of registration issued in respect of a clinical establishment shall be kept affixed in a conspicuous place in the nursing home.

Only changes in the term nursing homes to clinical establishment

Rule Section 5 (1973)

Grant of certificate of registration – the local supervising authority shall if satisfied that there is no objection to registration, register the applicant in respect of a nursing home and issue to him/her a certificate of registration in Form 'C'

Grant of certificate of registration – the local supervising authority shall if satisfied that there is no objection to registration, register the applicant in respect of a nursing home and issue to him/her a certificate of registration in Form 'C' If, after enquiry and giving opportunity of being heard to the applicant and having regard to the advice of the competent authority, the authority is satisfied that the applicant has not complied with the requirements of the Act and these rules, it shall for the reasons to be recorded in writing, reject the application for registration and communicate such rejection to the applicant as specified in particular form.

No Changes The involvement of the competent authority needs to be there when rejecting any applications, since this law is stakeholder friendly. A reasonable rectification period of say a month be given to the clinical establishment to make-up for the deficiencies pointed out in the LSA's report. This would be followed by reapplication by the doctor, reinspection by the Competent Authority before a final decision is taken by the Competent Authority. Such a provision is necessary as registration may be denied, sighting even minor deficiencies. Such reminder notice is necessary if the regulatory process is to be doctor friendly also, in addition to being consumer-friendly.

Rule Section 6 (1973) :

Renewal of registration – An application for the renewal of registration shall be made every year in advance in Form 'B' in the month of January, and shall be accompanied by the fee prescribed in sub-rule of rule 7.

An application for the renewal of registration shall be made every three years, three months in advance in specified Form and shall be accompanied by the fee prescribed in sub-rule of rule 7. Incase of late submission for renewal a grace period of 1 month would be considered with a late fee by the competent authority.

This is providing for those who submit late.

 

Rule Section 8 (1973)

Transfer of ownership etc. of nursing home – The transfer of the ownership or management of nursing home the transferor and the transferee shall jointly communicate the transfer effected to the local supervising authority and the transferee shall make an application for registration in accordance with the provisions of rule 4

The transfer of the ownership or management of clinical establishment the transferor and the transferee shall jointly communicate the transfer effected to the local supervising authority and the transferee shall make an application for registration in accordance with the provisions of rule 4 In case the establishment ceases to function as a clinical establishment, the certificate of registration shall be surrendered to the local supervisory authority.

Only changes in the term nursing homes to clinical establishment To follow the due process, it is imperative for the those to inform the local supervisory authority to cancel the registration and also protect the owner of the clinical establishment

Rule Section 9 (1973)

Change of address – A person registered under the Act in respect of a nursing home shall communicate to the local supervising authority any change in his address or in the situation of the nursing home in respect of which he is registered not later that seventy-two hours after such change.

'and or status' – A person registered under the Act in respect of a clinical establishment shall communicate to the local supervising authority any change in his address or in the situation of the clinical establishment in respect of which he is registered not later than seventy-two hours after such change. Further in case the status of the clinical establishment changes in any manner (increase / decrease in size, facilities etc. ) from the time of registration shall inform the local supervisory authority and pay the required fees or apply for refund.

Only changes in the term nursing homes to clinical establishment. A need for this provision since the size may increase / decrease from the time of registration to renewal and need to pay appropriate amount There should be a week's period to communicate this change to the authorities. Small establishments do not have separate human power to look after such administrative matters. No harm would be done to the interests of the patients or to the larger public interest, if this period is extended to a week.

Rule Section 10 (1973)

Change in staff – Any change in the medical, nursing or midwifery staff together with the dates on which such changes has taken place shall be communicated to the local supervising authority immediately and in any case, not later than three days of such change.

To be deleted

Due to the turnover of staff it is quite impractical for clinical establishments to follow this and the information is not so useful.

Rule Section 11 (1973)

Lost certificate – In the event of certificate of registration being or destroyed, the holder may apply to the local supervising authority for a fresh certificate and the local supervising authority may, if it thinks fit, issue such certificate upon payment of a fee of Rs. 5 A certificate issued under this rule shall be marked “Duplicate”

In the event of a certificate of registration being lost or destroyed, the holder may apply to the supervising authority for issue of a duplicate certificate of registration and the supervising authority, if it thinks fit, issue such certificate and / or upon payment of a fee of Rs. 100. A certificate of registration issued under this rule shall be marked 'Duplicate'. .

The amount of Rs. 5 is very low, it will not even cover the costs of paper.

 



Penalty for non-registration
Section 6

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

Whosoever contravenes the provisions of section 3, shall, on conviction, be punished with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees or, in the case of a second or subsequent offence, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees or with both.

Whosoever contravenes the provisions of section 3, shall on conviction for a first offence (non-registration) be punishable with a fine of ten thousand rupees or and with imprisonment for a termwhich may extend to 2 years, in the case of a second or subsequent offence (non-registration) with imprisonment for a term which may extend to (four years or with fine which may extend to twenty thousand rupees) or with both and shall in addition be liable to a fine which may extend to five hundred rupees for everyday) for which the offences continues after conviction. .

To provide for deterrence for those not registering and also identify bogus clinical establishment and take action. * Need to check with the law and judiciary dept. As provided in the existing BNHRA, imprisonment of up to three months should be there only for second and subsequent offence. This makes a clear distinction between failure of registration and evading of registration and hence this clause would be directed only against bogus doctors and criminals.

 


Cancellation of Registration to run the establishment
Section 7

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

Subject to the provisions of this Act, the local supervising authority may at any time cancel the registration of a person in respect of any nursing home on any ground which would entitle it to refuse an application for registration of that person in respect of that home, or on the ground that the person has been convicted of an offence under this Act or that any other person has been convicted of such an offence in respect of that same.

If at any time after any person has been registered in respect of any clinical establishment and granted a license therefore, the local supervisory authority is satisfied that the terms of license are not being complied with, may cancel such registration and license: Provided that no cancellation of any registration and license shall be made unless such person has been given an opportunity of explaining (within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a notice in this behalf) as to why such registration and license should not be cancelled.

In case the clinical establishment does any unlawful/illegal activity, need for local supervisory authority to take action after due hearing. This section should include the following: The competent authority must give written order with reasons for cancellation of registration.

 

Notice of refusal or of cancellation of registration
Section 8

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

1

Before making an order refusing an application for registration or an order canceling any registration, the local supervising authority shall give to the applicant or to the person registered, as the case may be, not less than one calendar month's notice of its intention to make such an order, and every such notice shall state the grounds on which the local supervising authority intends to make the order and shall contain an intimation that if within a calendar month after the receipt of the notice the applicant or person registered informs the authority in writing that he desires so to do, the local supervising authority shall, before making the order, give him/her (in person or by a representative) an opportunity of showing cause why the order should not be made.

If the authority is satisfied that the clinical establishment has violated or has contravened any of the provisions of this act or the rules or By-laws, the local authority/competent authority may order cancellation or suspension of the registration for such period as it may think fit and on such cancellation the certificate of registration shall stand withdrawn; provided that before a clinical establishment is cancelled it shall be given an opportunity to be heard.

In case the clinical establishment does any unlawful/illegal activity, need for local supervisory authority to take action after due hearing.

2

If the local supervising authority, after giving the applicant or the person registered an opportunity of showing cause as aforesaid, decides to refuse the application for registration, as the case may be, it shall make an order to that effect and shall send a copy of the order by registered post to the applicant or the person registered.

If the local supervising authority/competent authority, after giving the applicant or the person registered an opportunity of showing cause as aforesaid, decides to refuse the application for registration, as the case may be, it shall make an order to that effect and shall send a copy of the order by registered post to the applicant or the person registered.

In case the clinical establishment does any unlawful/illegal activity, need for local supervisory authority and competent authority to take action after due hearing.

3

Any person aggrieved by an order refusing an application for registration or canceling any registration may, within a calendar month after the date on which the copy of the order was sent to him, appeal to the government on any such appeal shall be final.

Any person aggrieved by an order refusing an application for registration or canceling any registration may, within a calendar month ( 30 days) after the date on which the copy of the order was sent to him/her, appeal to the clinical establishment board on any such appeal shall be final. Further any person aggrieved by the functioning of the local supervisory authority and or the competent authority may make a written complaint to the clinical establishment board.

This is to make the local supervisory authority and competent authority accountable. The appeal against the order of any body under this act should be heard by a Ombudsman-who could be a retired High court judge who will constitute an appellate authority and also serve as grievance redressal authority. Since the various authorities /boards created under the act are part of decision making process for rejection of application for registration, can they can not hear appeal against their own orders. There should be a provision to appeal to the health secretary or such high level health bureaucrat in case the ombudsman is on leave or non-functional for any reason. Otherwise appeals may not be heard for months together.

4

No such order shall come into force until after the expiration of a calendar month from the date on which it was made or, where notice of appeal is given against it, until the appeal has been decided or withdrawn.

No such order shall come into force until after the expiration of a calendar month (30 days) from the date on which it was made or, where notice of appeal is given against it, until the appeal has been decided or withdrawn.

No changes

 


Inspection of Nursing home
Section 9

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

The health Officer of the local supervising authority or the Civil Surgeon of the district in which a nursing home is situated or any other officer duly authorized by the local supervising authority or the Civil Surgeon, may, subject to such general or special orders as may be made by the local supervising authority at all reasonable times enter and inspect any premises which are used, or which that officer has reasonable cause to believe to be used, for the purpose of nursing home, and inspect any records required to be kept in accordance with the provisions of this Act.: Provided that nothing in this Act shall be deemed to authorize any such officer to inspect any medical record relating to any patient in a nursing home.

Every clinical establishment shall afford reasonable facilities for inspection of the place, equipment and records to the local supervisory authority or the competent authority or any other officer duly authorized by the local supervising authority or the competent authority may, subject to such general or special orders as may be made by the local supervising authority at all reasonable times enter and inspect any premises which are used, or which that officer has reasonable cause to believe to be used, for the purpose of clinical establishment and inspect any records, register, document, record, equipment and article as he may deem necessary for the purpose of the provision of the act. Provided that nothing in this Act shall be deemed to authorize any such officer to inspect any medical record relating to any patient in a clinical establishment.

In case it is brought to the knowledge of the local supervisory authority or competent authority that illegal, unlawful and malpractice is going on in the clinical establishment. Any person not below the rank of Tehsildar --- and should have technical/medical expertise relevant/similar to the clinical establishment to be inspected. The inspection will be done at the time of original registration and/or at time of renewal/and/or if the nature of the work is being changed. Such routine inspection be done at a time which is unlikely to disturb /interfere with the treatment of the patient and/or doctors work. There should be a separate clause for surprise inspection. It should be clearly mentioned that non-routine/surprise inspection would be done only when there is a written complaint from a patient or a representative body of patients/citizens alleging non-compliance of the provision of the act. In case of specific complaint, the authority ordering inspection must record in writing the reasons for inspection. The procedure of inspection should be laid down. The decision to do unscheduled inspection should be taken by the appropriate authority jointly and should if necessary be by the method of voting if there is a difference of opinion. The dissenting members should have a right to record their dissent. .Frivilous /vexatious complaint should be made punishable with a fine of Rs.5000/- The decision regarding this should be entrusted to an Ombudsman

 

If any person refuses to allow any such officer to enter or inspect any such premises as aforesaid, or to inspect any such records as aforesaid or obstructs any such officer in the execution of his powers under this section, he shall be guilty of an offence under this Act.

If any person refuses to allow any such officer to enter or inspect any such premises as aforesaid, or to inspect any such records as aforesaid or obstructs any such officer in the execution of his powers under this section, he shall be guilty of an offence under this Act.

No Changes The inspecting person should have a written order from appropriate authority with reasons mentioned for inspection. The stakeholder should have a right to get copies of the inspection report and if any records are seized reasons for seizure as well an official receipt should be given.

 


Income of Local Supervising Authority
Section 10

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

Any fees received under this Act shall be paid into the fund of the local supervising authority

Any fees received under this Act shall be paid into the fund of the local supervising authority for the implementation of this act.

The fees collected should not be put in the government treasury but be utilized for the implementation of this act.


Section 11

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

Notwithstanding anything contained in any enactment in regard to any municipal or local fund, all expenses incurred by a local supervising authority under and for the purposes of this Act and the rules and by-law may be paid out of the municipal or local fund, as the case may be.

Notwithstanding anything contained in any enactment in regard to any municipal or local fund, all expenses incurred by a local supervising authority and or competent authority under and for the purposes of this Act and the rules and by-law may be paid out of the municipal or local fund, as the case may be.

Though the fees should be used for implementing the provision of the act, there would be some areas, districts the fees may not be sufficient. The government should provide the same.

Rule Section 7 (1976)

Fees for registration and renewal of registration:- The fees to be paid for registration shall be charged as under:- a) Rs. 50 in respect of a nursing home having not more than 10 beds; b) Rs. 100 in respect of a nursing home having more than 10 beds. The fees for the renewal of registration, shall in each case, be equal of the amount payable for the first registration.

Kindly see accompanying table in annexure 1

The amount charged in the existing is very meager and does not even cover the administrative cost of registration. The fees collected to be used for implementation. The supreme court has, in one important judgment ruled that any registration fee has to be nominal. However, the Maharashtra government can levy a 'service-fee' for providing regulatory service. In principle, service fee should be such that the cost of regulatory service should be recovered through this fee. If the private sector were to develop a system of self-regulation and self-monitoring, it will have to collect contributions from medical practitioners to do so. Per medical establishment, this service fee would not come to much, as the only active service that the regulatory mechanism would generally provide is a triannual inspection, its report and registration certificate. Instead of arguing about arbitrary figures, let this principle be accepted. The larger and more advance set ups would pay more, as inspecting them would mean spending more time of more skilled personnel.

 


Penalty for offences under Act
Section 12

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

Whoever contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or of any rule shall, if no other penalty is elsewhere provided in this Act or the rules for such contravening, on conviction be punished with fine which may extend to fifty rupees and in the case of a continuing offence to a further fine of fifteen rupees in respect of each day on which the offence continues after such conviction.

Whoever contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or of any rule shall, if no other penalty is elsewhere provided in this Act or the rules for such contravening, on conviction be punished with fine which may extend to 5000 rupees and in the case of a continuing offence to a further fine of 50 rupees in respect of each day on which the offence continues after such conviction.

To act as a deterrent. Need to check with the Law and judiciary Dept Daily fine has been provided in the existing BNHRA. The proposal is to hike it to Rs.50 per day. This is OK.

 

Offences by Corporations
Section 13

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

Where a person committing an offence under this act is a company or other body corporate or an association of persons (whether incorporated or not), every person who at the time of the commission of the offence was a director, manager, secretary, agent or other officer or person concerned with the management thereof shall, unless he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or consent be deemed to be guilty of such offence.

Where a person committing an offence under this act is a company or other body corporate, include government and or an association of persons (whether incorporated or not), every person who at the time of the commission of the offence was a director, manager, secretary, agent or other officer or person specified in the registration form and concerned with the management thereof shall, unless he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or consent be deemed to be guilty of such offence.

Included government and have been specific in relation to the one on whose name the registration form is filled.

 

Court competent to try offences under Act
Section 14

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

No court other than that of a Presidency Magistrate or a Magistrate of the first class shall take cognizance of or try any offence under this Act.

No court other than that of a Presidency Magistrate or a Magistrate of the first class shall take cognizance of or try any offence under this Act.

No Changes


Indemnity to persons acting under this Act
Section 15

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall be instituted against any person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act, rules or By-law's.

No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall be instituted against any person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act, rules or By-law's.

No Changes Total immunity is not desirable in such a social legislation. The various boards/authorities should be accountable.

 

Rules
Section 16

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

1

The state government may by notification in the official Gazette make rules to carry out all or any of the purposes of this Act.

The state government may by notification in the official Gazette make rules to carry out all or any of the purposes of this Act.

No Changes

2

Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions such rules may prescribe- a) the form of the application to be made under section 4 b) the date on which an application for registration or renewal of registration to be made and the fees to be paid for such registration or renewal of registration c) the form of the certificate of registration to be issued under section 5 d) for any other matter for which no provision has been made in this Act, and for which provision is, in the opinion of the provincial Government necessary.

Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions such rules may prescribe- a) the form of the application to be made under section 4 b) the date on which an application for registration or renewal of registration to be made and the fees to be paid for such registration or renewal of registration c) the form of the certificate of registration to be issued under section 5 d) for any other matter for which no provision has been made in this Act, and for which provision is, in the opinion of the provincial Government necessary. - The principle and criteria for granting registration for a clinical establishment; - The terms and conditions of a registration; - To prescribe minimum requirements for various types of clinical establishment - The form of application for a registration of a clinical establishment - The form of the periodical returns and statistics to be submitted by the clinical establishment to the authority - The mode of holding meetings and the conduct of business by the authority; The state government through the clinical establishment registration board may by notification constitute, in such manner as maybe prescribed, committee/s to advice the state government on the implementation of the provision of this act The clinical establishment registration board may, if it considers necessary, for dealing with any special issue before it, invite any person's (s) to attend any meeting but such person shall not be deemed to be a member of the authority, nor shall he have a voting right

No Changes The clinical establishment board cannot by itself make standards. Making standards is a specialised job. The board would establish committees to harness expertise in specialised branches of medicine.

3

The power to make rules under this section shall be subject to the condition of previous publication in the official Gazette.

.

No Changes



By-law's
Section 17

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

1

The local supervising authority may make by-laws not inconsistent with this Act or rules - (a) prescribing the records to be kept of the patients received into a nursing home, and in the case of the maternity home, of miscarriages, abortions or still births occurring in the nursing home and of the children born therein and of the children so born who are removed from the home otherwise than to the custody or care of any parent, guardian or relative. (b) requiring notification to be given of any death occurring in the nursing home.

The local supervising authority may make by-laws not inconsistent with this Act or rules - a) prescribing the records to be kept of the patients received into a clinical establishment, and in the case of the maternity home, of miscarriages, abortions or still births occurring in the nursing home and of the children born therein and of the children so born who are removed from the home otherwise than to the custody or care of any parent, guardian or relative. b) requiring notification to be given of any death occurring in the clinical establishment.

No Changes

2

Any by-laws made by a local supervising authority under this Act may provide that a contravention thereof shall be punishable - a) with fine which may extend to fifty rupees; or b) with fine which may extend to fifty rupees and in the case of a continuing contravention, with an additional fine which may extend to fifteen rupees for every day during which such contravention continues after conviction for the first such contravention; or c) with fine which may extend to fifteen rupees for everyday during which the contravention continues after the receipt of a notice from the local supervising authority by the person contravening the by-law requiring such person to discontinue such contravention.

Any by-laws made by a local supervising authority under this Act may provide that a contravention thereof shall be punishable - a) with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees; or b) with fine which may extend to fifty rupees and in the case of a continuing contravention, with an additional fine which may extend to fifty rupees for every day during which such contravention continues after conviction for the first such contravention; or c) with fine which may extend to fifty rupees for everyday during which the contravention continues after the receipt of a notice from the local supervising authority by the person contravening the by-law requiring such person to discontinue such contravention.

As a deterrent

3

No By-law made by the local supervising authority shall come into force until it has been confirmed by the state Government with or without modification.

No By-law made by the local supervising authority shall come into force until it has been confirmed by the state Government or the body entrusted by the state government with or without modification.

No Changes

4

All by-laws made under this section shall be published in the official Gazette.

All by-laws made under this section shall be published in the official Gazette.

No Changes



Saving
Section 18

 

 

Existing provision

Proposed changes / Incorporation

Rationale for changes

 

Nothing in this Act shall apply to - i) any nursing home carried on by Government or a local authority or by any other body of persons approved by the state Government in this behalf; and ii) any asylum for lunatics or patients suffering from mental diseases, within the meaning of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912.

Nothing in this Act shall apply to any asylum for lunatics or patients suffering from mental diseases, within the meaning of the Mental Health Act, 1987 The government run clinical establishments will be excluded from paying the registration fees

The government should provide funds for implementation where the number of clinical establishments are very few and there may not be sufficient money collected as registration fees. The government insitution should also pay the registration fees and other charges as applicable especially when the fees collected will be used for implementation and enforcement of the act.

 

New Suggestions / Incorporations In The Present Act / Rules

Furnishing of information

Every clinical establishment shall, within such time or within such extended time as may be fixed by the clinical establishment registration board in this behalf, furnish to the competent authority such returns, statistics and other information as the clinical establishment registration board may from time to time require.

Immediate report about notifiable diseases- The keeper of the clinical establishment shall submit a report immediately, to local supervisory authority as soon as it comes to his/her notice that any person who has been admitted or examined as a indoor or out-door patient in the clinical establishment is suffering from or has been attacked with a contagious diseases. A format for filing such reports should be provided to establishments at the time of registration. In case an establishment does not file reports, the renewal of it's registration may be withheld or other penalty may be imposed.

There is already the provision in the notifiable diseases act. There should not be duplication of the acts.

The records of reports of all investigations conducted, diagnosis etc. should be provided to the patient on discharge. Provision of discharge slip to all patients should be routine and mandatory. However copies of detailed case records, indoor record sheets and reports of investigations could be made available on written request and on payment of photocopying charges.

This section mentions that it is obligatory on the part of the clinical establishment to inform the nearest police station about all suspicious cases or injuries and all medico legal cases. There is no need for this section. It is a settled law that a doctor or any citizen who has knowledge of any crime must inform the police. It has also been held by the
Bombay High Court (Dr. Patki v/s Govt of Maharashtra) that if the patient/person admitted to the hospital does not disclose the details then the doctor/person owning the clinical establishment has no mechanism to investigate the truth. This is the job of the police. This clause would be an avenue for harassment of the staff of the clinical establishment.
Also after the judgement of Supreme Court in Parmanand Katara v/s Union of India there is no need for a separate clause.



Constitution of the competent authority and apex body

 

Competent Authority means “the committee constituted under this act to assist the local supervisory authority in discharging the functions under this act. It shall include the collector of the district or his / her representative or Commissioner in case of municipal corporation or his / her representative, head of the local supervisory authority, 1 professor or lecturer from nearest medical college, one representative from the hospital owners association, one representative from the laboratory owners association, one representative from the homeopathy association, one representative from the Indian system of medicine association, one representative from a government clinicall establishment, one representative from the local consumer organization and non governmental organization working in the area of health and one women's' organization and one representative of insurance companies. (Representatives from consumers organisation, NGO working in the area of health and women's' organisation can be selected by consensus in a meeting of such organisations convened by the Collector / Commissioner).

A representative from the Indian Medical Association be included as the IMA is the largest, oldest body of medical professionals.


·        The term of the competent authority would be for a period of 5 years.
·        The collector / commissioner would be the chairperson of the authority.
·        The head of the local supervisory authority would be the member secretary.
·        A chairperson would be elected from amongst themselves
·        The quorum for any meeting shall be four, including the chairperson.
·        The committee would meet at least once in two months to transact the business.
·        The competent authority shall also act as a grievance redressal forum regarding provisions stipulated under this act where it would entertain complaints from patients, consumers, and lay public among others.

Without derogation to any law for the time being in and without prejudice to the generality of its power functions of the authority shall be
(a)        Receive applications for grant of registration to clinical establishment
(b) Scrutinize the applications and call for further information or particulars from the applicants or from any other persons or authority as may be required; (c)        Consider the applications and pass orders; and
(d)        Do such other things as are necessary or incidental for the purposes of this act

Not withstanding anything contained in this act, the state government may at any time reconstitute the competent authority if it finds its functioning unsatisfactory.


The power of the governmentto reconstitute competent authority should be with qualification. If the competent authority needs reconstitution then it is the right of the stake holders who are paying registration fees and the consumers to know the reasons. It should be mandatory on the government to disclose the details/reasons of reconstitution.

The authorities under this act should be fully accountable. All the stake holders, registered establishments, consumers should have complete access to the information. The chairman of the local supervisory council/competent authority/clinical establishment board should be made responsible for ensuring the transparency of the functioning of these authorities and access to information. The various authorities under this act must publish annually all the details about the number of registrations,number of complaints and the outcome of complaints. This record should be available electronically also.


Clinical Establishment Registration Board
: This board is set up under the act to be an apex body for the implementation of the act, lay down minimum requirements (standards) or upgrade existing requirements periodically (every 5 years) for different types of clinical establishments, appropriate number of types of clinical establishments in a geographical area and suggest revision of fees charged periodically (every 5 years).

The board would consist of Secretary Public Health department, Secretary medical education department, Secretary urban development department, Director general of health services would be the member secretary, 2 joint directors, 1 representative from the state Indian Medical Association, 1 representative from the Homeopathy association, 1 representative from the Indian system association, 1 representative from the laboratories association, 1 representative from the hospital owners association, 1 representative from the dental association 1 representative each from two state level consumer organization and 1 representative from a non government organization working in the area of health and 1 representative from a State –level womens' organization.

The government would strive and provide information under this act to the general public or any other body information related to the functioning and findings of the local supervisory authority, competent authority and clinical establishment registration board.

Minimum Requirements of Clinical Establishment

 

Every clinical establishment shall fulfill and conform at all times to the requirements (standards) framed from time to time as per the provision in the Act, rules and By-laws. These standard may apply to the structure (staff, building, space requirements, equipment or other facilities), the process (what services and how the services are provided) and the outcome (results). The clinical establishment registration board so constituted by the government under this act shall lay down standards.

The clinical establishment board should appoint committees consisting of experts from relevant sections of medical professionals and one representative of consumer/health NGO to decide diagnostic and therapeutic protocols for common clinical situations to start with. There protocols would be based on consensus protocols already available nationally, internationally, to be modified suitably for Indian conditions.We would not be able to monitor medical practice on the basis of these protocols, but these protocols would be used as reference standards in case of any allegations about alleged substandard care.

, A beginning can be made with simple measures like giving a copy of the case-paper to patients, giving adequate information to the patients etc.
        Standards for outcomes are much more difficult to agree upon and monitor. Hence this needs to be deleted today.
It is necessary to include in the act that the clinical establishment board will constitute various expert groups and finalise the standards. These standards should be published and should be available for every consumer. Also the clinical establishment should clearly display the grade for which it has been registered. The act should also include provision for upgradation and review of standards periodically.
Having a qualified midwife in any maternity home is an ideal scenario. But it has not been taken in to account that many of the infrastructural facilities are inadequate.For example enough no. of qualified nurses are not available.Therefore the minimum requirement need to be qualified with words to the effects: “Whereever qualified staff is not avalable,trained staff should be allowed”It also necessary to amend the relevent parallel acts like Maharastra Nursing Council Act to improve the situation



Obligations of Clinical Establishment

 

Every clinical establishment shall

o        Administer necessary first aid and take other life saving or stabilising emergency measures appropriate for that grade of establishment in medico-legal or potentially medico-legal cases such as victims of road accidents, accidental or induced burns or poisoning or criminal assaults and the like which present themselves at the establishment.


There are nursing homes which conduct only minor day-surgeries like opthalmic or ENT. There is no doctor available after the surgeon has left, since generally this is not needed. Such set-ups can not cater to any general medical or accident emergency even to provide life saving support . So only hospitals should have this obligation.
However, even the nursing saff in all clinical establishments should be trained to give life saving first aid consisting of clearing of the airway, mouth to mouth breathing, external cardiac message, starting an IV line, arresting external bleeding by pressure bandage, proper positioning of the unconscious patient.


·  In times of epidemics or disasters the government may call upon clinical establishments to provide services.

·  Actively participate in the implementation of all national and State health programmes in such manner as the State Government may reasonably specify from time to time , and to furnish periodical reports thereon to the concerned authorities.

 

The suggested changes include active implementation of national health programmes by the registered establishment It is necessary to substitute this formulation with the following --. ”All the private clinical establishments will follow the mandatory therapeutic guidelines for diseases covered under various national health programmes and as declared by the state and central government from time to time, and to co-operate with the state health authorities for implementing National Health Programmes.”

    • Perform statutory duties in respect of disease surveillance, non-communicable and communicable diseases so as to prevent the spread of the disease to other persons and report the same to the concerned authorities immediately.

The clinical establishment shall not refuse admission or treatment) of any patient on the grounds that s/he has human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Refusal to entertain any patient who also has HIV infection should not be allowed. But we it can not be made obligatory that all doctors must treat all patients for HIV disease, as this treatment is many a times a specialist job which not every doctor would be able to handle competently.The government with the help of concerned experts in the field including those in NGOs, should prepare Standard Orientation courses about care of HIV positive patients, for different types of medical care workers ranging from doctors to attendants. It would include basics of HIV, AIDS including its social aspects, about Universal Precautions, and the duty of doctors, and other medical professionals towards HIV positive patients.

This course should be aimed at dispelling the excessive scare of medical workers getting HIV infection from HIV positive patients. This course be publicly funded. Half the funds can come from the service charges collected from MEs under the MME Act. The
Maharashtra government must set up adequate facilities so that all medical workers in the MEs can undergo this course within a year's time of the enforcement of this amended act.

All medical workers must register themselves to undergo this course within a year of the enactment of MEA. As soon as all the staff any M.E. have completed this course, it shall certainly execute the policy that there shall not be any discrimination against any HIV positive patients. After two years no ME shall employ any person as medical staff who has not undergone this certificate course.

Engaging Government servant

The keeper or owner of the clinical establishment shall not engage any government servant for any work including consultation without express permission of the Government obtained by such a government servants in this behalf and in the event of engagement of any government servant in the clinical establishment, the keeper or owner thereof shall furnish to the supervising authority details of engagement of such government servant or full time/part time basis along with the emoluments paid to him/her by the clinical establishment. .        The responsibility for informing the clinical establishment about being in government service and taking the permission of the government to work in the clinical establishment should rest with the employee and not with the employer.

Display of fees, costs and rates for various services

 

Every clinical establishment should arrange display of the fees, costs and rates of all kind of services in order to maintain due transparency.

Power to remove difficulties

 

If any difficulty arise in giving effect to the provisions of this act or in the interpretation of any of its provisions the state government may within the ambit of the act, by order remove the difficulty or interpret the provision and such order shall be final and binding.

Miscellaneous

 

Any person who knowingly serves in a clinical establishment which is not duly registered and licensed under this Act or which is used for unsocial or immoral purposes, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees
If somebody knowingly works in a MANEGERIAL CAPACITY in an unregistered, i.e. illegal medical establishment, such a person may be fined with a fine of upto Rs. 500.

Not withstanding any provision, the clinical establishment shall follow all applicable rules e.g. Waste management, drugs and medicines, employees, building safety norms etc.

***************

Annexure I

 

Fees Charged

 

Rural

Urban

Metropolitan

Hospitals, Nursing Homes, Maternity home, any Health Centres upto 10 beds

1500

2250

3000

Hospitals, Dental Hospitals, Nursing Homes, Health Centres with 11 to 30 beds

2500

3750

5000

Hospitals, Dental Hospitals, Nursing Homes, Health Centres with 31 to 100 beds

5000

7500

10000

For each additional bed above 100 beds

20

30

40

Clinical laboratories / Diagnostic center X-ray Centres and/ or Ultra Sonogram Scan Centre

2500

3500

5000

Imaging centers, C.T. Scan Centres and / or MRI Scan Centres

10000

15000

20000

Physiotherapy Centres

2000

3000

4000


Note:
Wherever a clinical establishment / hospital is offering additional ancillary facilities mentioned above eg. laboratory, X-ray, CT scan etc. within the same set-up, the registration / renewal fee for the ancillary facility would be 50% of the fee for a stand- alone establishment.

The figures in the table above will have to be changed. The service fee will have to be worked out on the basis of the cost of the regulatory service being provided by the govt.



Annexure II

DEFINITIONS

Clinical establishment: any premises used or intended to be used, for the reception/counseling/
treatment/ therapy/ surgery/ physical correction/ manipulation of persons suffering from any sickness, injury or infirmity and the providing of treatment and nursing for them.

Day care centers : Which conduct only minor 'office procedures' like ophthalmic or certain ENT minor surgeries.. There is no doctor available after the surgeon has left, since generally this is not needed

Maternity home: ( permitted only in non-metro area) : where patients maybe admitted for normal delivery and in case of emergency patient maybe shifted to NH or hospital for surgery.

Nursing Home: a clinical establishment with facilities for in-patient stay at night also, but no casualty facilities and limited speciality facilities and limited emergency facilities for non-indoor patients.

Hospitals: Nursing Home plus comprehensive round the clock emergency and trauma facilities with multi-specialty emergency facilities.

ICUs: facilities for 24 hour intensive management with advanced life support systems and availability of 24 hour post-graduate medical specialists of respective fields. Eg general ICU, PICU, NICU, ICCU.

**************


 

BEYOND LAW AND THE LORD
Quality of Private Health Care


Sunil Nandraj


Although the private sector in health care is large and growing, it is poorly regulated with hardly any regard to quality of care.

The World Bank paper on 'Health Financing in India' and the 'World Development Report 1993' advocated privatization and liberalization of the health sector. How relevant are these policy prescriptions for he Indian context? What exactly is the nature if the private health sector in India? What are the regulatory and monitoring in this sector?

The private health sector is a large and important constituent in the country's health care delivery system. The share of the private health sector in India is sector is between 4 to 5 percent of the Gross Domestic Product. This share at today's prices works out to between Rs. 16,000 crore and Rs. 20,000 crore per year. India probably has the largest private health sector in the world (Duggal and Nandraj, 1991). This sector has enlarged greatly in the post independence period, especially in the 80s. A substantial financial burden of households is for meeting health care needs (1). This gains significant when we realise that nearly half of the country's population does not have enough resources to meet its food requirements. Compared to state expenditure on health the private household expenditure is nearly four to five times more than that of the state (Duggal and Amin, 1989).

EXTENT OF PRIVATE PRACTICE

Data on sectoral distribution of doctors is not easily available because many states do not file that required information in the ministry of health. A study conducted in 1963-64 by the Institute of Applied Manpower Research showed that out of a total of 1,00,189 doctors 39 per cent of them were in government service and 61 per cent doctors in the private sector of the allopathic system of medicine. Out of those in private sector 88.4 per cent were self-employed and 11.4 per cent were employed in the private health establishments. (Jesani and Ananthraman, 1993). A study in Ahmednagar district, Maharashtra, identified a total of 3,060 doctors belonging to all systems of medicine in the district, of whom 92 per cent were in the private sector (including a very small percentage in the voluntary sector). Of the 3,060 identified doctors, 91.5 per cent were general practitioners and 8.5 per cent were specialists, information not being available for 10 per cent of the doctors. Of the total doctors identified 51 per cent were in urban areas and the rest in rural areas. In urban areas, GPs constituted 77 per cent and specialists 13 per cent while the degrees and specialisations of 9 per cent of the doctors were not known. In rural areas, 85.5 per cent were GP's, specialists constituted only 1.8 per cent and the information on 11.9 per cent was not available. Further with regard to break up of specialists out of the total 234 specialists, 22 per cent were gynecologists, 20.5 per cent were surgeons, 12 per cent were physicians, 10 per cent were pediatricians, 7 per cent were ophthalmologists, 6 per cent were anaesthetists, 5 per cent were dermatologists and orthopaedics, 4 per cent were ear nose & throat (ENT) specialists, 2 per cent were psychiatrists, 6.5 per cent fall in the category of others (includes radiologist, pathologists, cardiologists, plastic surgeons, physiotherapists) (FRCH,(a)1993)

Practitioners also consist of those having dubious qualifications and degrees or having no qualifications at all such as those who have worked as helpers, compounders or assistants for other doctors for a period of time and have picked up the skill in the process. In this category sometimes spouses of doctors are also included, who sit in the clinic when the doctor is away. Also included in certain cases are the sons/daughters who 'inherit' the practice of their parents. A study conducted in Madhya Pradesh showed that of all those treated by private facility, 52.24 per cent of the illness episodes in rural, 17.83 per cent in urban areas were treated by licentiates/RMPs (George, Shah and Nandraj 1993). The extent of quackery can be gauged from the advertisements which appear regularly in leading newspapers of the country for cure of various illnesses. The decay has set in so much that posters are displayed openly at local railway stations of Bombay urging people to become a doctor (2). In Maharashtra the government appointed a committee to look into the matter of quacks and take action against them. With the help of public health machinery at various levels 4,971 bogus doctors were identified and the list sent to the state and police authorities for further action Sampark, August 1993. Till date no action has been taken on the report.

In India, during 1974, 16 per cent of the hospitals and 21.5% per cent of the hospital beds were in the private sector and rest were in the public sector. This proportion increased in 1990 to 57.100% per cent of the hospitals and 29.12 per cent hospital beds in the private sector. There are reasons to believe that the number of hospitals in the private sector is much larger than what the available data suggests. According to data in Health Information of India 1992, there were only 1,319 private and voluntary hospitals in Maharashtra, and the Directory of Hospitals brought out by the Ministry of Health listed 1,174 hospitals in Maharashtra. But the Bombay Municipal Corporation listed 907 private hospitals and nursing homes in Bombay city alone (excluding Thane), on the basis of its registration data which again is an underestimate. Another instance of under reporting of data is brought out by a survey undertaken by Andhra Pradesh Vaidya Vidhana Parishad, which found the existence of 2,802 private hospitals and 42,192 private hospital beds in Andhra Pradesh in 1993. According to data available with GOI as on January 1 1991, however Andhra Pradesh had only 266 private and voluntary hospitals and 11,103 private hospital beds. (Health Information of India 1991). The survey also showed that 67.60 per cent of the private hospitals were located in urban areas (which were state capital, divisional HQ, district HQ and taluka HQ). The bed: population ratio in private sector was 6.37 beds per 10,000 population and in the public sector 5.12 per 10,000. Ahmednagar district, Maharashtra, had 274 hospitals and nursing homes in the district, of which 82 per cent were privately owned, 7per cent by the public sector and 4 per cent by voluntary-missionary and 7 percent not known. The response to the mailed questionnaire from 90 hospitals showed that there were a total of 2,241 beds and the private hospitals accounted for 1,050 beds (FRCH, (a) 1993,).

The above data suggests that the size of private hospitals is much larger than official data brought out by the government. Secondly that indoor care provided by private hospitals is much larger than public hospitals and this growth has taken place mainly in urban areas. The increase has occurred not so much because private hospitals are better equipped, more efficient and manned by better qualified and more humane staff as because public hospitals have simply failed to keep pace with the demand, have been starved of funds, are neglected and run down.

A recent development in private health sector has been the growth of corporate hospital, rightly termed 'Medical Industrial Complex' (Relman 1988). In 1983, the first corporate hospital in India was set up in Madras. It was established by Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Ltd (AHEL), which within five years recorded a turnover of Rs 11.48 crore and a net profit of Rs 1.66 crore. Many corporate houses and non-resident Indians have recently joined this enterprise. e.g. Hindujas, Escorts group, Standard Organic group, Surlux Diagnostic Centers, United Breweries group, Goenkas, Birlas and the Modis. In a span of two years, 1984 to 1986, over 60 diagnostic centers have entered the market with an investment of over Rs 200 crore in sophisticated equipment. Today Bombay has 13 body scanners, Delhi has 11, Madras 8, Calcutta 3, Hyderabad 2, Pune 3 and Ahmedabad 3. (Jesani & Ananthraman 1993,). Each of the MRIs cost Rs 6 crore a piece. The United Group owns over 32 body scanners and 14 brain scanners in the country (Indian Express, May 18, 1989). Suffice to say that with the rise of the corporate sector, the cycle in health care does not start with a trained medical person and a sick person in search of each other, but with an investor in the share market in search of profitable investment : the availability of newer medical technology and a market in medical care being merely an attractive form of investment (Phadke 1993).

Most of the big corporate and trust hospitals are concentrated in metropolitan cities. Many of them use the facade of register themselves as trust hospitals with a view to getting various benefits from the state and escape various taxes.

QUALITY OF PRIVATE CARE

Only recently attention has been focused on the serious anomalies with regard to the functioning and quality of care being provided by private practitioners. This was possible because a number of cases of medical malpractice and negligence filed in the court of law by the victims and their relatives as well as due to role-played by the media and different consumer organisations.

For specialised treatment like hospitalisation and investigations, the GP would refer the patient elsewhere. Informal discussions and meetings with private doctors revealed that in metropolitan cities like Bombay, Delhi, Calcutta, etc, and also in smaller urban areas like Ahmednagar, Nasik, Pune there is form of 'cut-practice' operating. For referrals made, a part of the fee charged to the patient is given to the referring doctor. A GP/consultant gets a cut if s/he refers a patient to a consultant, hospital/nursing home, laboratory, diagnostic center etc. In Bombay, the cut-ratio is as high as 30 to 40 percent of the fees charged. As per a new system which has started operating, if a consultant wants to start practice, s/he should deposit a certain amount of money with the local GP for referrals to be made by him/her. In some towns of Maharashtra informal associations of doctors have standardised the ratios of cuts to be given. Recently in a suburb of Bombay the GPs exerted pressure on the owners of private hospitals/nursing homes to increase the ratio of the 'cuts'. Cut-practice operates with everybody's knowledge but there has been no documentation or study of this aspect. Cut-practices inevitably leads to unethical and unnecessary investigations, referrals, hospitalisation, high costs, etc. For those doctors who want to practice ethically and rationally survival in this atmosphere is difficult.

The technical/medical knowledge of the doctors regarding treatment being provided to the people needs to be examined. Two studies on knowledge and awareness among doctors regarding tuberculosis and leprosy were conducted in Bombay. It was found that for treating tuberculosis patients, 100 private doctors prescribed 80 different regimens, most of which were inappropriate and expensive. (Uplekar and Shepard 1991). With regard to leprosy, it was found that there was a gross lack of knowledge and awareness among private doctors about the disease and about the National Leprosy Control Programme. (Uplekar and Cash 1991). The medicines and injections, which the doctors use, are either samples given by the medical representatives or those bought from the open market. Usually the doctor gives those medicines and injections received as samples or sells at a higher rate those bought. This is unethical since the doctor infringes on the Pharmacists trade. Some of the doctors also give medicines in loose paper packets or bottles. This practice is incorrect since the patient does not know what the packets/bottles actually contain. There is rampant and use of irrational medicines and injections by the doctors in the private health sector. In Jalgaon district Maharashtra for illness episodes of diarrhoea, 72.5 per cent received injections, for cough & cold, 66.7 per cent received injections; for malaria, 87.5 per cent received injections; for measles, 61.1 per cent received injections and for heart diseases 76.5 percent received injections (Duggal and Amin 1989). Irrational practices are common among doctors in the public as well as private health sectors. But it is on the higher side in the private sector. In the study conducted in Madhya Pradesh it was further found that out of 884 illness episodes which received medicines along with injections, 86.09 per cent of them received it from the private health facility. (George, Shah, Nandraj, 1993).

Further, preliminary results of a study being conducted in a typical district of Maharashtra found that unnecessary use of injections, irrational drug combinations, hazardous drugs and unnecessary drugs were prescribed more in the private sector. Out of a total of 633 prescriptions analyzed from 27 private clinics it was found that 28.9 per cent were of irrational drug combinations, 9.6 per cent were for hazardous drugs, 45.7 per cent were unnecessary drugs and 26.5 per cent were unnecessary injections. Compared to 591 prescriptions from 17 public clinics, it was found that 2 per cent were irrational drug combinations, 0.5 per cent were for hazardous drugs, 28.4% were for unnecessary drugs and 24.2 per cent per cent were for unnecessary injections (FRCH (b)1993). The main source of continuing education for doctors are the medical representatives. Medical representatives of the pharmaceutical industry, including those from the renowned multi-nationals, in their race for fulfilling targets approach those not having proper or dubious qualifications. In this manner, they also encourage quackery.

The Time spent on the patient for diagnosing and explaining would depend on the load of patients, the doctor has per day/hour and or demand for the services. A public opinion study conducted by Medico Friend Circle showed that out of 208 respondents 61 per cent of them felt that the waiting period to see a doctor was highly unreasonable : that is, beyond 20 minutes (MFC, Bombay Group, 1993). Besides many of the doctors while dispensing medicines and injections or recommending investigations, do not provide information to the patient regarding the diagnosis and side effects. In fact, many of them get angry when questioned about the side effects of the drugs prescribed, the investigative procedures recommended or regarding the diagnosis. The MFC study found that 41 per cent of the doctors did not give information about the diagnosis and among those who gave information only half gave complete information. Only 16 per cent of the respondents were given information on side eggects of drugs. About 48 per cent of the respondents were completely satisfied with the behavior of the doctors, 27 per cent partially and 17 per cent not at all.

Doctors' charges are more often than not exorbitant and irrational.The charges levied are arbitrary, irrational and without any proper basis. The question of fees and charges raises ethical issues, the important one being the basis on which the price skills in a profession which is meant to be caring are computed. There are no restrictions or guidelines for the fees charged by the practitioners or consultants in the country. There is no standardization of fees in the country. In the MFC study, in answer to the question regarding standardisation of fees charged by the doctor, it was found that 65 per cent of them felt that there should be some form of standardisation of fees. The study also found that nearly 76 per cent of the doctors did not give a receipt for the payments made, only 24 per cent of them gave receipts after being asked for it.

The earnings of doctors have been studied only recently. A study undertaken in Bombay city found that a GPs net income, on an average, works out to Rs 16,560 per month (George 1991). Another study conducted in Delhi found that on an average the net income of a GP practicing in a clinic or residence was Rs 24,290 p.m., and a graduate gynaecologists income was found to be Rs 28,910 p.m. With regard to those having post graduate qualifications in medicine, the average income was found to be Rs 27,880 p.m., for general surgery Rs 37,870 p.m.; and for gynecology Rs 53,870 p.m. (Kansal 1992).

The fees of the doctors has grown apace with private health care. The NCAER study showed that 55 per cent of the household expenditure on health care was spent on private doctors and only 39per cent on public institution. Many patients and their family members have been pauperized during the course of treatment from the private health facilities.

Figures regarding cases treated, diagnosis, type of treatment provided, amount charged etc. are not easily obtainable from private hospitals and nursing homes. Only recently due to the demands made by the judiciary, various facts have come out. In Calcutta a petition was filed by an advocate in the Calcutta High Court regarding the conditions of private hospitals and nursing homes. In response to this a committee was appointed by the speaker of the West Bengal legislative assembly in 1985 to prepare a report. This report found that the nursing homes lacked adequate floor space, ventilation, lighting, water, bathroom facilities and qualified doctors and nursing staff. (The Telegraph, 2nd July 1989).

In 1991 the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court directed the Bombay Municipal Corporation (BMC), to set up a permanent committee to oversee and supervise the implementation of the Bombay Nursing Home Registration Act (BNHRA), 1949, and make recommendations. This judgment came about due to a public interest litigation filed by a victim's daughter and the activists of MFC (MFC) (Bombay Group). In this case a homeopath doctor administered a wrong blood type during transfusion to the patient in an allopathic hospital. The case raised questions regarding standards of medical practice in private hospitals and nursing homes, quality of staff employed and treatment offered equipment used the general administration of these hospitals and their accountability to the people at large. The case also further highlighted the role of the implementation agencies.

The committee decided to look at the functioning of existing hospitals and nursing homes in the city of Bombay. As part of the committee, the author studied 24 hospitals and nursing homes in the eastern zone of Bombay [Nandraj 1992]. The major findings from the study are used here to throw light on the various broader issues with regard to private hospitals and nursing homes.

In India the contrasts in the private health sector with regard to the hospitals is vast. While there are the huge corporate hospitals but majority are those having 10 to 30 beds, with the average number of beds in Bombay being around 10. As it is quite well known very few hospitals function from an independent building. The study in Bombay found that 62.50 per cent of the hospitals were located in residential premises, and 12.5 per cent were run from sheds, which had roofs of asbestos, tin. etc and only 8.33 per cent had a independent building. The study further found that 50 per cent of the hospitals were located in poorly maintained buildings or were in a dilapidated condition. Hospitals functioning from residential premises pose various difficulties. Residents staying in the premises are put to a lot of hardship. Secondly, a residential premise is not suitable for a hospital or nursing home with its narrow passages and small doors. The urban development department of the BMC specifies that the hospital if run from a residential building, should be located on the ground floor or the first floor only and that they should have a separate entrance. In rural areas, a practicing GP generally keeps one or two beds in the clinic for the exclusive use of his/her patients since the facilities for indoor care are quite distant. These could also be considered as hospitals since they provide indoor care.

The study in Bombay found that out of 22 hospitals and nursing homes supposed to have an operation theater (OT), only 15 had OT, in 7 of them the labour room was combined with the OT. The average area of the OT was less than 100 sq.ft. It was generally observed that some of the OTs and labour rooms were in the kitchen. Leakages were to be found in the OT and labour room with paint from the ceiling and walls peeling off and 17 hospitals and nursing homes did not have a scrubbing room. As for emergency there were no supportive services like ambulance services, blood, oxygen cylinders, generators etc. Many of the hospitals and nursing homes were ill equipped, especially those providing maternal health services, for instance many of them did not have resuscitation sets in the labour room for new born babies. Many nursing homes claim to provide ICCU services but many of them do not have or able to afford the necessary equipment. They do not have doctors round the clock. And even those that do rarely have an allopathic doctor trained in cardiology.

Private hospitals and nursing homes fall very short of the requirement. Majority of them employ unqualified staff. In Bombay out of 24 hospitals and nursing homes only 1 hospital had employed a post graduate doctor, whereas 10 had doctors trained in other systems. Few hospitals had provision for the doctors to be present round the clock. Majority of the nursing homes utilised the services of visiting consultants. Many private hospitals are staffed or run by doctors employed in public hospitals. It is quite common for such doctors to lure patients to their private hospitals, while misusing public facilities.

Only 7 institutions employed qualified nurses and that too one nurse each. Most of them had employed unqualified nurses who were either trained by doctor or had received training for about 3 to 6 months from various private training institutes which have also sprung up to meet the needs of private hospitals. These nurses are paid measly salaries and their working conditions are pathetic. During informal discussions with the nurses it was found that they were paid around RS 500 to Rs 700 per month in Bombay. In another study in Delhi it was found that the condition of those employed in private health establishments, were working in extremely grim conditions. For almost all of the categories of personnel, the maximum salaries drawn by private medical employees was lower than that of the government employees in the same category. This apparently is an exploitation of lower staff by high-income private practitioners (Kansal 1992).

The sanitary conditions of private hospitals and nursing homes leaves a lot to be desired. The Bombay found that many of the hospitals were congested lacked adequate space: passages and entrances were narrow and crowded. There was not enough space for easy movement of a trolley or a stretcher. The study in Bombay found that in 37.50 per cent of cases, the hospital premises were dirty, as were the beds, especially in the general ward. More than 60 percent of the institutions did not have a minimum of 50 sq.ft space for each bed. Lighting facilities were found to be inadequate in 10 of the hospitals and nursing homes.

The area surrounding the hospital plays an important role in the treatment of a patient. During the study it was observed that one of the hospitals was situated near a factory and the entire atmosphere was visibly polluted. Noise emanating from the factory was well over prescribed limits. Many of the nursing homes were found to be situated close to a busy traffic spot. Our findings with regard to waste disposal were shocking. All the hospitals studied, disposed of their waste in the common garbage dump. This form of disposal has serious implications, because of the increased risk of spreading infectious diseases, AIDS. Secondly, waste disposed thus may be recycled for further use as reports from Delhi have shown.

The number of toilets and bathrooms were not in adequate proportion to the number of beds provided in the hospital and also the area provided for such facilities are very small. During visits to the hospitals in one of the hospitals the blood stained linen was being washed in the common bathroom and being dried in the passages. It was quite shocking to note that many of the hospitals did not have continuous supply of water, and in some of them it was being provided from outside through tankers and other means.

In the recent past care provided in private hospitals has come in for closer examination. Private hospitals tend to perform unnecessary investigations, tests, consultations and surgeries. Doctors in private hospitals more often do not reveal the diagnosis and go on recommending tests to 'diagnose' the ailment. Whereas in the public hospitals, doctors are required to write the diagnosis on the case paper. Due to the fact that the surgeries are 'profitable' many private hospitals are found to be conducting unnecessary surgeries. The KSSP survey revealed that 31 per cent of deliveries were by caesarean section. More significant 70 per cent of the hospitals where caesareans were routine were privately owned (Kannan etal, 1991). In Maharashtra the Mangudkar committee found that the average rate of caesareans childbirth in government hospitals was 5 per cent while in private sector it was nearly 30 per cent. According to a member of the committee private clinics charge between Rs 2,000 and Rs 5,000 for caesarean delivery while normal delivery fetches them Rs 300 to Rs 700. Ultrasound investigation, amniocentesis, epidural anaesthesia etc. are done unnecessarily, particularly in private nursing homes. One of the doctors in Bombay commented "Very often endoscopy is done just because the hospital has the facility" (The Week, Jan 5 1992). In the bigger hospitals there is pressure on the doctors to ensure that all the beds are occupied at all times and equipment available in the hospital are used fully. Admittedly, many hospitals fix the amount of 'business' a physician/surgeon has to bring.

The majority of private hospitals and nursing homes across the country are generally refer patients who develop complications to public hospitals so that they are not liable for cases of death. Most of these hospitals refuse admission to accident cases and those cases involving medico legal work, even when patients are in a very serious condition. Many institutions refuse admission to patients, unless a certain amount of money is not paid beforehand. Public hospitals in most cases do not refuse admission to serious patients, if they have the facilities. In public hospitals one can still demand services while in private hospitals they can turn patients at their will.

Most private hospitals are run by 'medical entrepreneurs'. Many do not maintain proper books of accounts. The charges are different for diverse kinds of nursing homes. The charges include consultation fees and charges for bed, nursing, operation, operation theater, various investigations and disposables used, for medicines, etc. These charges are levied by different entities - for instance the Doctor conducting the operation would be different from the one who owns the nursing home, the anesthetists charges are again separate. We found that the accounts in only one paediatric baby care nursing were maintained properly. There it was found that the total gross income for one month was Rs 2,20,000 (Nandraj 1992). A study undertaken in Delhi of the earnings of the private practitioners and that of the ones running nursing homes with graduate (MBBS) qualifications, their net income per month was Rs 73,650/ and the ones having post graduate degrees the earnings were up to Rs 79,960.p.m. (Kansal 1992). In Delhi the amendment under discussion is seeking to get the charges levied by the hospital, displayed in a prominent place.

Private hospitals are known to have an unhealthy nexus with the pharmaceutical industry. 6 patients who had every chance of survival died in a prestigious private hospital in Bombay due to the administration of a sub-standard drug during operation. Reports alleged that 3 doctors attached to the hospital were connected with the ownership of the company, which had supplied the drug. Private hospitals are less accountable to the people than government hospitals. If they have not had as much bad publicity as public hospitals, it is primarily because patients reluctance to name names, or reveal information and reliable because of the inaccessibility of reliable information.

REGULATORY BODIES

The rules and regulation framed for practitioners broadly fall under their respective State Council Acts for various systems of medicine. The practitioners are also governed by the Drugs and Pharmaceutical Act of 1950. Recently private practitioners and hospitals have been brought under the purview of the Consumer Protection Act. Medical councils are statutory bodies that set the standard of medical practice, 'discipline' the profession, monitor their activities and check any malpractice. The certificate of registration issued by the council, which has to be displayed in a conspicuous place in the place of practice. The council has to maintain a register of the doctors and this has to be updated regularly. Renewal of registration has to be made periodically. Those not registered with the medical council cannot practice. Although the bulk of the practitioners in the country are trained in other systems of medicine like Homeopathy, Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, etc. most of them practice allopathy.

The medical councils regulating the conduct of doctors have failed in their duties miserably. They have even failed in their basic duty of maintaining and updating the register of doctors. This is reflected in the data brought out by Health Information of India where many state medical councils have not sent in the required information to the central government for years together. In the Maharashtra Medical Council (MMC) the register of doctors is outdated and full of errors. Secondly, there have been very few instances of doctors being penalised for negligence or violating the code of ethics. The enquiries are held in secrecy. The Maharashtra Medical Council (MMC) was unable to produce even a single record of action taken against erring doctors. The medical councils in the country are in a mess. They have given permission to private medical colleges which are substandard, understaffed, those not meeting the minimum prescribed standards, like having their own hospitals etc. and have failed to resist the pressure from politicians for opening of new medical colleges.

The Recent elections to the MMC clearly brought out the way things are managed in the council. Elections are held through the postal ballot method. The registers of the council were not updated; so in a few instances ballot papers were sent to doctors who had long expired. The names of doctors who had registered with the council were not found in the register; doctors who were indicted in the law courts and with dubious degrees were candidates in the fray. There was massive rigging in the election process. A panel of doctors who were in the fray paid money to the postal department and intercepted ballot papers which were not meant for doctors who were absent or dead, etc and stamped them. Blank ballot papers were collected in an organised manner from doctors across the state and stamped. In an open forum some of the doctors in fact endorsed this practice, saying that there was nothing wrong with this procedure. Clearly, there is something seriously wrong. Politicians doing the same thing would have been accused of fraud. Do doctors expect patients to believe that a council elected in this manner is capable of disciplining unscrupulous practitioners? [Pandya S 1993].

A study undertaken on behalf of the MFC (Bombay group) on rules, acts, regulatory and monitoring mechanisms existing in various states of India, came out with disturbing findings. A mailed questionnaire was sent to all the health departments of the state governments and union territories in India. Tamil Nadu, Punjab, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Goa Daman and Diu, Mizoram, Gujarat, Orissa, Sikkim and Manipur responded to the questionnaire. None of these states have any rules, laws, regulations or even data for private hospitals and nursing homes. Government of Kerala specifically wrote back "This state government has no control over private hospitals/nursing homes functioning in this state at present, as there is no legislation now for this purpose". Added to these states are Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan. This was found out through visits and discussions with government officials of the respective state governments. To our knowledge only in Maharashtra and Delhi there is a legislation for private hospitals/nursing homes. In Delhi there is the Delhi Nursing Home Registration Act (DNHRA), 1993. One of the largest private health sectors in the world, providing 70 percent of care in India, functions practically unregulated!

The broad features of the BNHRA and DNHRA Acts are somewhat similar. The objectives of these acts are to provide for registration and inspection of nursing homes. The acts stipulate that every year the nursing home and hospitals are required to make an application for registration or renewal for registration to the local supervising authority, which could be the municipal corporation, municipal body, district board, district panchayat etc.During the time of application detailed information should be provided in terms of qualification of staff, adequacy of staff, sufficient and proper equipment, adequate accommodation facilities and space, and regarding sanitary conditions. Maternity homes have to specify whether they have got on their staff a qualified midwife. The Maharashtra Act provides for the local authority to formulate bye-laws. On receipt of application for registration the local authority may refuse to register the application if any person employed in the nursing home is found unfit, weather by reason of age or otherwise of it the nursing home or hospital is not under the management of a qualified medical practitioner of a qualified nurse, or does not have adequate space, equipment etc. Failure to register under the BNHRA could mean a fine of Rs 500 for the first offence and imprisonment for three months.

There are other regulations that are also applicable to hospitals and nursing homes such as those referring to or related to buildings, drainage and sanitary facilities; laws regarding Employees- Provident Fund, minimum wages, maternity, working conditions among others. In addition to these hospitals registered, as trusts or public societies have to follow the legislation formed for the trusts and public societies. These laws make it essential to file returns periodically to the appropriate authority.

During the proceedings of the public interest litigation it was found that the municipal corporation, the authority for registration in the city of Bombay, was not enforcing the Act. The municipal corporation started registering the hospitals and nursing homes after the case was filed. The judges in their order observed that " The writ petition has served the purpose of activising the concerned authorities, who seem to have woken up and taken certain steps in the direction of implementation of the various provisions of the law". The municipal corporation during the hearings admitted that in several wards of the city, the officials had not visited the hospitals for the past two to three years consecutively. Many of the nursing homes were not registered with the local ward office as per requirement. In fact, one out of four hospitals were functioning without proper registration. It admitted that for the last three years it had not taken action against any hospital or nursing home nor collected fines. It has not prosecuted a single nursing home upto now. The municipal corporation could not submit a complete list of private hospitals and nursing homes functioning in Bombay to the court. In Delhi, the administration admitted that only 134 out of 545 nursing homes were registered. The BNHRA act is applicable to all of Maharashtra, however its implementation was found to be restricted to the cities of Bombay, Pune, Nagpur and Sholapur. During the hearing of the case, the State Government issued a directive to all the municipal corporations, councils and municipalities in Maharashtra urging them to implement the provision of the said Act. However during field work the author found that the directive was not implemented as the local bodies did not have enough information regarding the Act, (one of them did not even have a copy of the Act), and also the bye laws were not yet formulated by the bodies. Both the Acts are very deficient. The use of the words like 'adequate' makes the provisions ambiguous. They do not spell out what 'adequate' means with regard to the provision of the acts. There are no minimum requirement and guidelines regarding space, sanitary conditions, personnel, equipment, fees to be charged etc to be followed by the hospital and nursing home authorities.

The judges in the Bombay High court recognized the inadequacy of the existing Act and also its poor implementation directed the Bombay Municipal Corporation (BMC) to appoint an apex committee and three zonal committees to look into the implementation of the act and make recommendations. The committees were overwhelmingly filled with bureaucrats of BMC, who in the first place were supposed to implement the act. Right from the inception bureaucrats in the committees started placing obstacles in the committees functioning. And very little progress has been made on the matter.

Corrective action needs to be taken to bring about reforms in this sector. As a first step people should be made aware of their rights and duties vis-a-vis the health care system, specifically the private health sector. There should be adequate representation of the people and consumer organisations on the various regulating and monitoring bodies functioning at various levels. Legislation should be enacted where there is none legislation and the various existing legislations should be implemented. The State should ban and take strong action against the private practice of doctors employed in Government institutions. One of the main reasons behind the non-functioning of the public health system is due to the private practice of the Government doctors and other functionaries. With regard to private practitioners, the state and medical councils should ensure that only properly qualified person's practice. Through licensing and other means the proper geographical distribution of practitioners and hospitals in the country to prevent over-concentration in certain areas. There should be regular medical and prescription audits and the renewal of license and registration should be dependent on it. Records should be maintained properly and the patients should have access as a matter of right. Minimum standards and requirement for various types and kinds of hospitals and nursing homes should be laid down. With regard to charges and fees there should be standardization of fees charged by the practitioners and fixation of reasonable charges by hospitals and nursing homes for the services provided. These should be displayed prominently in a conspicuous place. There is a need for overhauling the medical councils in the country. They should make provision for the registers to be maintained properly and keep them open for public scrutiny. There should be provision for continuing medical education on a periodic basis with renewal of registration dependent on it.

NOTES

The support of friends and colleagues at MFC, CEHAT and FRCH underlies this article, in particular the author has greatly benefited from Ravi Duggal and Amar Jesani of CEHAT who have encouraged me in carrying out the above mentioned studies. Thanks are also due to Alex George for his helpful comments.

  1. In 1986-87, 42nd round of National Sample Survey organisation (NSSO) found that for hospitalized cases 36.85 per cent episodes in rural and 36.59 per cent episodes in urban areas used private hospitals and nursing homes. With regard to OPD, 53.01 percent cases in rural and 51.83 per cent cases in urban areas utilised the private doctor. Private hospitals and nursing homes accounted for 15.88 per cent cases in rural areas and 17.33 per cent in urban areas. The per capita expenditure on health per year by the household was Rs.56.18. (NSSO, 1989). NSSO data are gross underestimates when compared to micro level studies conducted by other organisations. During the same period the Foundation for Research in Community Health (FRCH) conducted a study in Jalgaon district of Maharashtra. This study brought out that in 83.45% of acute illness episodes private practitioners and hospitals and only in 9.07% public health facilities were utilised. The per capita expenditure on health was found to be Rs. 182.49 per year. 7.64% of total consumption expenditure and 9.78% of reported income were spent by the household on health care. (Duggal and Amin 1989). Kerala Shastra Sahitya Parishad (KSSP) which undertook a study in rural Kerala in 1987 found that in 66% of illness episodes approached private health facilities. The per capita cost per year incurred by the household on health was Rs.178.33. The percentage of the reported income spent on health was found to be around seven percent. (Kannan, K.P., Thankappan K R, Raman Kutty V, and Aravindan K P, 1991). National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) conducted an all India study in 1990 which brought out that the private doctor was utilised in 54.75% of illness episodes in urban areas and 55.46% of episodes in rural areas. The average household expenditure for treatment worked out to Rs. 142.60 per illness episode in urban areas and Rs. 151.81 per episodes in rural areas. (NCAER, 1992). During 1991, the per capita expenditure incurred by the State was Rs.58. (Duggal Nandraj, Shetty, 1992). Another study conducted in two backward districts of Madhya Pradesh, Morena and Sagar by the above organisation in 1991 showed that out of 1,932 illness episodes reported, 69.05% were treated by private health facilities. The per capita expenditure incurred by the household on health worked out to Rs.299.16 per year. (George, Shah, Nandraj, 1993). The per capita expenditure incurred by the state during 1991 on health was Rs.45.

 

  1. Become a Doctor, Join Bachelor of Electropathy Medicine and Surgery (BEMS), Minimum qualifications 10th/12th std/equivalent, 3 years course.


REFERENCES

Duggal R, S Amin (1989): Cost of Health Care, Survey of an Indian District, FRCH, Bombay.

Duggal R, S Nandraj (1991): 'Regulating the Private Health Sector', Medico Friend Circle Bulletin,173-174, July/August.

Duggal R, S Nandraj, S Shetty (1992): State Sector Health Expenditures: A Database, All-India and the States, FRCH, Bombay.

FRCH (a)(1993): Health Sector Resources, Investment and Expenditure in a District, FRCH, Pune, Draft Report.

FRCH (b) (1993): Interim Report on Study of Drug Utilisation and Cost in Government Health Care services in a District by A Phadke.

George A(1991): Earnings in Private General Practice, An Exploratory Study in Bombay, Medico Friend Circle Bulletin 173/174, July/August.

George A, I Shah, S Nandraj (1993): A Study of Household Health Expenditure in Madhya Pradesh, FRCH, Draft Report.

Jesani A, S Ananthraman (1993): Private Sector and Privatization in the Health Care Services, FRCH, Bombay.

Kannan, K.P.,K R, Thankappan, V,Raman Kutty, and K P Aravindan (1991):Health and Development in Rural Kerala, K.S.S.P, Thiruvananthapuram.

Kansal S M (1992): Contribution of 'Other Services Sector' to Gross Domestic Product in India, An Evaluation, EPW, Sept 19.

Medico Friend Circle, (Bombay Group) (1993): Patient-Provider Interface: A Public Survey, MFC, Bombay, Draft Report.

National Council of Applied Economic Research (1992): Household Survey of Medical Care, NCAER, New Delhi.

National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO): Morbidity and Utilization of Medical Services, 42nd Round, July 1986-June 1987, Report No 364, Dept of Statistics, GOI, New Delhi.

Nandraj S (1992): Private Hospitals and nursing homes: A social Audit, Report submitted to the committee appointed to regulate private hospitals and nursing homes in the city of Bombay, Bombay.

Pandya S (1993): 'Rot in the Maharashtra Medical Council, Medical Poll'. The National Medical Journal of India, Vol 6, No 2, March/April 1993.

Phadke A (1993): Private Health Sector, FRCH, Bombay.

Relman Arnold (1984): The Medical Industrial Complex' in the New England Journal of Medicine, Sept 22,

Uplekar, M W, D S Shepard (1991): Treatment of Tuberculosis by Private General Practitioners in India, Tubecule 72, 284-290.

Uplekar, M W, R A Cash (1991): The Private GP and Leprosy : A Study, Leper Rev 1991 62, 410-419.

Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XXIX, No. 27, July 2 1994, pp. 1680-5.


Order this publication - A22

Order Form for All Publications

Sitemap

 

© Copyright Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes